Flotilla: Israel endangers its own security

@freegaza.org Flickr stream

By Alessandro Di Maio

OPINION. At present moment the details remain unknown, but it is certain that the consequences of the attack launched this morning to international flotilla direct to Gaza, will mark negatively the already affected Israel’s image in the world. The greatest risk is to lose the traditional and strong alliance with what is now a regional power, Turkey.

It ended in blood the adventure of  the ‘Freedom Flotilla’, a group of ships belonging to European NGOs en route to Gaza with the target to break the Israeli naval block and deliver humanitarian aid to the Palestinian population. The last reports says 10 activists killed and 26 injured, six of them Israeli soldiers.

From the beginning it was easy to realize how delicate the issue of the flotilla would be for the government of Tel Aviv, but the tragedy triggered by the use of violence could be the final shove to the traditional diplomatic alliance between Israel and Turkey, already fluctuating over the past two years.

NATO member and now powerful protagonist in the Middle East, Turkey has participated actively in the organization and sponsorship of the “Freedom Flotilla”: many activists on board of the ships were Turkish, many organizations were Turkish and Turkish was also the enormous flag displayed on the side of the ferry “Mavi Marmara”.

The attack would take place between 4:30 and 5 am (local time) about 75 nautical miles far away from the Israeli coast, in international waters. According to the Israeli Army Press Office, “on five of the sex ships of the flotilla, the soldiers met without any resistance from the passengers and the ships were brought to the Ashdod port” without troubles, but “during the boarding of the Turkish ship – the Mavi Marmara, the largest of the flotilla’s ships – the Israeli Navy soldiers were attacked with gunfire, stun grenades, knives and dubs. The demonstrators – continued the press release – stole two pistols from the soldiers and used to shoot at the soldiers, obligating the soldiers to operate their weapons in light of the danger to their lives”.

Organizers of the “Freedom Flotilla” deny the charges, stating that the ship was weapons free because before the departure each participant has been checked with metal detectors. To confirm its version, the Israeli Army has recently published a few videos from the assault, from which is possible to see the violent reaction of activists during the boarding of the Israeli soldiers.

During the press conference on May 27th, the commander of the Israeli Navy, Vice Admiral Eliezer Marom, said that as IDF soldiers they “will act professionally, operating according to the spirit and the values of the IDF because – he continued – we have a very clear mission to carry out: we will prevent them [the flotilla] from entering the Gaza Strip”.

Of course the IDF fully accomplish to its  mission – the flotilla ships are now moored in the Ashdod and Haifa ports – but how much will this mission costs Israel?

Nobody knows it yet, but for now only two things are clear: not all the activists came in peace; the Israeli Navy soldiers were not trained enough – professional enough – to afford a group of people with knives and dubs.

From the “No Global/Black Block” groups to the Ultras groups during the soccer matches, the different European polices are facing similar situations almost everyday: in most of the cases shooting is not the normal behavior to stop and capture someone who is using metal rods, but if it happens the police chief and to the minister of defense will lose their seats.

In Israel, as reported from Haaretz – the most prestigious Israeli daily English newspaper – the Prime Minister, Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu, reacted “regretting the loss of life sustained by international activists” but specifying that “the Israeli troops who opened fire were justified for defending themselves”.

EU, UN and Turkey asked Israel for an investigation that – even in the most positive case for Israel – will never sew up the enormous psychological shock suffered by the world and the diplomatic tear with Turkey. In a few words: Israel damaged its already negative image in the world and with many probabilities the traditional alliance with the only Islamic friend, Turkey.

The IDF mistake was not only to send un-professional soldiers into the field, but also to attack a Turkish ship in International waters – and not in the Israeli or Gaza naval territories. If for the International Maritime Law what happened to the Mavi Marmara can’t really be considered a pirate act (the doctrine is not defined yet), for the Turkish government it is as a strong slap.

An “act of State terrorism”, as the Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said today, after recalling the Turkish ambassador in Israel, suspending the traditional joint military exercises with the Israeli Army and asking for a special session of the UN Security Council.

For two years now, Ankara has made slow and progressive steps toward Middle-eastern alternative positions, going far away from the traditional Israeli partner and meeting Syria, Iran and the Palestinians.

The causes of this strategic movement are essentially three: the Turkish target to became a recognized regional power and so the necessity to get as more partners as possibly in the Caucasus and in the Middle East (where many countries don’t recognize Israel as a legitimate country); the scaling of power in the governmental establishment of the Turkish military class (with whom Israel had always excellent relations); the last Israeli military operations in Gaza (considered “disproportionate” by the Turkish government) and the gaffes of the new Israeli government (see the episode occurred last January, when the Israeli deputy foreign minister, Dany Ayalon, ridiculed the Turkish ambassador Cellikol during the break in a television program).

The event on the Mavi Marmara is really a heavy blow for Ankara, particularly because of the repeated requests to Israeli government to formulate a rational and acceptable way to disembark the humanitarian aid from the fleet – as in the past, August 2006, the approach to the coast of Gaza was allow.

Yes, Turkey is moving far away from Israel but it seems that the Israeli government is wishing to lose the partnerships as soon as possible, as a punishment to Ankara for its the new geopolitical strategy and the relations with Iran.

It is true, Israel has many enemies. Many of them are Arabs countries that wish the destruction of Israel, others are supporters of the anti-Zionist cause, but in these days – see Netanyahu’s response to the agreement on nuclear non-proliferation in the Middle East or the prohibition to the American professor Noam Chomsky to go to the West Bank for a university lecture – seems evident that the most dangerous enemy of Israel is its own government, always ready to display an excessive use of force that endanger the security of Israel and undermine its image in the world.



Filed under Diplomacy, Middle East

4 responses to “Flotilla: Israel endangers its own security

  1. Hanan

    I really liked your opinion Aless, even though i don’t completely agree. But, that was an intelligent input.. U should note that this was translated from Italian, and maybe provide the link for the Italian version.

  2. Hi Hanan, thanks for the comment. Yeah, unfortunately I had to translate it very fast and the results are not so good. I think that in same passages I couldn’t express myself in English. But anyway, I will add to the piece that indication. 🙂

  3. Adi

    as i told you,
    israeli government does not care about the image of israel in the world.

    but i think the sad thing is that WE, the journalists, are starting to embrace this term – imaging.

    imaging is the wrapping that cover the real thing. we, as journalists, are supposed to discover those things rather than deal with the images.

    and just to make it clear – i am not reffering specificly to your article.

  4. alessandrodimaio

    Dear Adi,

    I agree with you when you say that we – as journalists – are supposed to discover the truth exploring the things that are behinde this story.

    But let me say that I can’t really do it. I was not on the board of the ship or in Israel when the tragedy happened.

    I was and I am in Sicily. From here it is really hard to know who was the first to use violence – Israeli soldiers or the “pacifists” – because I have not the right tools.

    The only thing I can do from here is: trying to analyze the effects of the tragedy using the passion (and the small knowledge) I have of the International relations and diplomacy.

    I am very sorry for the people who have been killed but people die contiusly everywhere and I don’t want to write about them.

    I am more interested about the image of Israel in the world, about the future of the relations betwen Israel and Turkey, EU, USA or whetever.

    Hugs bro!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s